WARNING, WARNING THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE. TRIGGER WARNINGS PAST THIS POINT. IF YOU FIND THAT YOU CANNOT CONTINUE SEEK YOUR SAFE SPACE. HOT COCOA, COLORING BOOKS AND SANITIZED CARTOONS WILL BE PROVIDED.
As for the rest of you brave souls buckle up its going to be a bumpy ride.
So the next portion of this post will be only fit for the toilet.
There are times when I told you so just doesn’t seem to convey the right response. But I told you so. Rather those of us who understand that since the fallen nature is present in all of us certain behaviors will be present. Case in point: Since the transgender revolution has come and the “gender neutral” bathroom/locker room are becoming the (ab)normal the fakers have come out. In October of 2015 at the University of Toronto two different women said that someone tried to film them using a cellphone. And this was of course in a gender neutral locker room. Because of that the amount of gender neutral bathrooms have been reduced and instead bathrooms that are for those who identify as female or male have been assigned.
But wait will that really solve anything? Seattle Parks and Recreation is finding that designating locker rooms for women doesn’t mean a thing if you identify as a woman or at least cite the law that says you can do that. On February 8th during the busiest time of the when the pool is open for lap swims, a man dressed in board shorts walked into the women’s locker room and undressed. When confronted and told to leave the man cited the transgender law and said he didn’t have to go. Now the man never identified himself as a woman he just said that they couldn’t make him leave because of the law.
Now this of course has caused protests on both sides of the issue. Opponents claim the rule opens up bathrooms to voyeurs but supporters say that’s an unrealistic fear. Tell it to the women in the University of Toronto.
However the icing on the cake is this comment from a progressive blog:
cisgender women might just have to deal with cis men creeps attempting to invade spaces that have traditionally been designated as “safe” for women.<source>
Tell me, really, how do you feel about your wife/sister/daughter dealing with this?
So let’s talk about this:
— NARAL (@NARAL) February 8, 2016
Humanizing fetuses, you know Jeff Durbin has this excellent thing he says to quit talking Latin because fetus is Latin for baby. But think about this what else do two human beings have but another human? I mean when was the last time two humans had a puppy?
Now look at this:
How can you see this, where one baby comforts another in the womb and say that they aren’t human?
So let’s talk politics. How would you, or your church reply to something that was morally wrong but made into law? Todd Friel has a nice little video that shows just how to do that.
Read the actual letter here: Our statement on marriage
And that is it for Frenetic Friday Night.